Let’s cut to the chase – you’ve all had a rough year. Sales are hurting pretty much across the board and our Teflon-like annual industry sales figure is down for the first
time in what seems like forever. It pains us to say it, but the halcyon
days are over.
That said, distributors and suppliers are getting more crafty and creative with their marketing campaigns, both the ones they devise for clients and those they design for themselves. Everyone has been looking for new ways to compensate for shrinking sales and wayward clients. Anything is fair game. Hunker down. Innovate. Slash and burn. Forge ahead. It really didn’t matter what people tried as long as they tried something. Complacency was the kiss of death. This is a new century, and there’s a new paradigm: “Whatever it takes.”
And guess what? In many areas, this kind of scrappiness appears to have been just the shot in the arm the industry needed. “This industry has gone from 38-plus years of growth to two back-to-back years of decline,” says Sam DiBiase, vice president of Counselor Top 40 supplier Leed’s (asi/66887). “Some of the largest distributors and suppliers are out of business or
struggling to stay afloat. Distributors are seeing their margins erode and their value challenged by their clients. Successful distributor salespeople are leaving established distributorships to go out on their own or to join franchise models. More distributors are trying to be suppliers when it best suits them; some suppliers are trying to be distributors, selling direct when they can. Suppliers are spending more time managing
collections and their DSO than ever before. These are not the trends of a healthy industry.”
|
Q:
What were the biggest events/trends
affecting your business last year?
FOR
SUPPLIERS
- Recession/economy
- Electronic art transfer
- Increasing number of trade shows
FOR
DISTRIBUTORS:
- Recession/economy
- Clients cutting their promotional budgets
- Electronic art transfer
Source: The Counselor; annual State of the Industry survey. ©2003 |
|
Suppliers: Not The Same Old Same Old
Sounds pretty bad, right? The thing is, if you were paying attention to some of these trends and digging a little deeper, you learned a lot. Example: The combination of a slow-to-recover economy and increasingly techno-savvy end-users (who are more than capable of “Googling” keywords like “T-shirts,” “pens” and “mugs” all on their own) showed suppliers and distributors that they need to find new ways to keep existing customers, generate new business and expand their market share.
Result: An overwhelming majority of suppliers (95%) have a Web presence, and they say it’s used most often as a marketing tool for client communication/education and customer service. The most frequently used Internet tool was e-mail, followed by banner ads and links. But there are some sticking points. For instance, while 42% of distributors say they want to hear about new products via e-mail, nearly 60% note they don’t want to be communicated with in that fashion. So what do you do, throw up your hands in frustration? Maybe it’s better to use e-mail like salt around the rim of a margarita – sparingly and to add some kick.
A majority of suppliers who opted to establish and/or build an Internet presence as their primary market strategy for 2002 saw a positive, measurable effect and consider it one of the most effective things they did last year to improve their business.
“There is a massive unopened stack on my floor that proves to me that I don’t use catalogs much,” says Dave Liegeot, president of A.I.A./Promotional Advantages Inc. (asi/109480). “If people are using them, then it’s simply habit but, like a good dog, I’ve been housebroken of that bad habit and use the Internet way more often.”
Additionally, nearly one-fourth of responding suppliers say the Internet is playing a vital role in their businesses – though the vast majority (77%) do 10% of their sales or less via the Internet. As for generating leads, the average number was almost 10%, with smaller suppliers ($0 to $500,000) generating the most – perhaps because it’s a relatively inexpensive option compared with other marketing tools like trade shows or mailings.
“I use Promomart to track down a source and then use catalogs to refine the search,” says Colin Searle, owner of Black Cat Promotional Products (asi/140717). “[It’s] very quick and easy to navigate, and a lot of times I’ll pick up graphics from Promomart rather than give the client a catalog, and they seem okay with that. I’ve used catalogs to give clients a choice and they usually return them after a decision is made.”
Touring Like A Rock Star
Between national promotional products shows, those sponsored by regional associations, distributor shows, tabletop shows, traveling showcases and end-user shows, suppliers and distributors could be perpetually “on tour” if they so chose. Suppliers, as always, have the hard choices to make as far as which shows to attend and which offer the best return on their investment of time and money.
“Trade shows provide the only way that distributors can see the majority of our product line in person,” DiBiase says. “We also utilize trade shows to expose internal sales support personnel to face-to-face meetings with distributor salespeople that may have only had contact with us via phone, fax or e-mail.”
DiBiase’s opinion is that it’s nearly impossible to determine if a trade show is a profitable investment. “With the number of shows increasing and at times overlapping while marketing budgets decrease or, at best, remain flat, making decisions regarding trade show participation is a difficult challenge for suppliers and distributors alike,” he says. “As a general rule, we participate in the shows that
make sound business sense for Leed’s. End-user shows would
generally rank last; some distributor shows rank higher if the focus for the salespeople is on supplier education and working projects. A national show such as PPAI Vegas is strong because it’s the
kick-off for the new year. Regional shows like ASI Orlando and ASI Dallas work because they draw, for the most part, distributors who aren’t attending other shows throughout the year.”
It’s ironic: Though many suppliers lament the number of trade shows in the industry, a majority of respondents (54%) say exhibiting at shows is their preferred form of self-promotion, along with catalog mailings (also at 54%). In fact, they note that shows are their main source of new business.
Scott Wood, vice president of marketing for Time Products Int’l. (asi/91320), has his company exhibiting at most industry trade shows and believes the opportunity to network with both suppliers and distributors and test market new products and ideas are some of the great advantages of being a regular on the show circuit.
“Exposure is the name of the game,” he says, “and this holds true in print and electronic media as well. However, you have to market before, during and after the event, as well as do follow-up.” Wood does feel that there are too many shows too close together in the calendar year and says this could eventually have a negative effect: “We’ll have to cut our booth space size, and next we’ll be making choices about which shows to drop and which to let the multiline reps do,” he predicts, adding that he’s tracking leads and ROI more closely than ever.
More For Less
When asked what their top market strategy was last year,
nearly 30% of suppliers chose quality over quantity, focusing their resources on increasing business from a select number of distributors (interestingly, this was not one of the top two strategies cited by suppliers in last year’s SOI).
Delving deeper, smaller suppliers generally chose to increase distribution channels for their services, while mid-sized firms ($500,001 to $2,500,000) and large suppliers (over $2,500,000) were the ones that favored working with select distributors. One might surmise that larger suppliers can afford to be picky about who they do business with, while smaller companies don’t have that luxury.
“Our marketing strategy for 2002 focused on multilevel coverage in trade shows, through reps, electronic media and print media,” says Wood. He also admits that while pruning existing business is the easier path, it’s a lot of fun introducing the company to new clients. “We definitely attack all parts of the market segment,” he adds.
Maybe it’s because suppliers are expanding their client base. Maybe an increasing number of distributors are entering the industry. Maybe it’s a bit of both. Whatever the answer, suppliers did business with an average of 1,346 distributors last year, up from 1,183 in 2001 and 870 in 2000. Keep in mind, however, that averages include some broad swings of the data. For example, 92% of smaller suppliers did business with 500 or fewer distributors, while 43% of large suppliers did business with more than 2,500 distributors.
Preferred vendor relationships, once looked upon by suppliers as having the same kind of clout as being on the VIP list at the Viper Room, doesn’t appear to be the marketing panacea everyone thought it was. Though nearly 37% of distributors believe working with preferred vendors has a “strong effect” on their business, suppliers noted that some distributors use this relationship to shave suppliers’ prices, which is obviously not a plus for them.
DiBiase says that from a cost-savings standpoint, Leed’s has invested in operational areas that will yield improved efficiencies and ultimately save money. “We also worked to standardize imprint methods, locations and minimum order quantities wherever possible to reduce cost,” he adds.
And in a move different from many other suppliers, Leed’s aggressively expanded its entire go-to-market offering this year. “[We did this] while most suppliers were circling the wagons and waiting for the recession to end,” DiBiase says. “In a recession, you have two choices: You can hunker down to weather the storm or you can seize the opportunity to gain market share. We took the latter path and it proved successful for Leed’s in 2002.”
One would have to agree. Unlike many suppliers who saw a dip in their sales figures last year, Leed’s actually climbed in the Counselor Top 40 rankings, cracking the top 10 and moving into the number 8 spot. In one year, the firm’s sales rose 15%, and few would argue that a double-digit increase in the current economic climate is a rare thing indeed. Obviously, they chose the right path ... .
Cleaning House
Some people feel that tough times offer the best excuse for pruning your client list. Others say you need to hold on to anyone and everyone. As it turns out, it largely depends on how big you are. Roughly three-quarters of suppliers who responded to this year’s survey say they “fired” up to 10 of their distributor customers. On the other hand, small suppliers eliminated almost no one from their client roster – maybe because they’re newer to the industry, less experienced or hesitant to turn away business.
And while most suppliers – 85% – maintain a database of customers, mainly to track purchase amount, frequency and distributor profitability, only 14% say they track successful promotions to distributors and calculate ROI – and even fewer (12%) have a formal client loyalty or recognition program in place. However, when tracking and client appreciation programs are utilized, markedly higher gross profit margins are realized, so maybe it’s time to join the measurement minority.
Another area where supplier and distributor philosophies diverged: The majority of suppliers maintain that developing a new product line was the smartest thing they did in 2002 to improve their business, followed by attending and/or exhibiting at more trade shows. Conversely, distributors don’t put nearly as much emphasis on the importance of new products. Only a third feel there weren’t enough new products in 2002, and 41% say the new products that were available weren’t all that interesting to their clients.
“I used to think finding new products was paramount to be cutting edge,” Liegeot says. “But after chasing the ‘new & different’ for a couple of years I realized that while most customers say that’s what they want, they buy items that are ‘tried and true.’”
|
SOI Data-Mining
What’s Your Market Strategy?
For the second year in a row, distributors’ top-rated market strategy
was “to focus resources on increasing business from a select number of clients,” although a much smaller proportion of distributors selected this option in 2002 than in 2001.
What does this mean? More important, what do distributors who want to focus on increasing business from a specifically targeted group of clients do differently from other distributors – and does it work?
The obvious place to start is your customer database. After all, you might want to select certain clients because they’re doing an increasing amount of business with you already. Or perhaps because they always do programs that allow you to charge for creative and consulting services, thus boosting your gross profit margins.
So what do distributors who chose this strategy actually use their databases for? The largest group say they track purchase amount per client, followed by tracking purchase frequency and, finally, tracking individual profitability. These, of course, are the necessary steps to identify which clients would be the best prospects for increasing business.
But identifying your best customer/prospects isn’t enough. The next
step is figuring out what you can do to increase your business with them.
Less than 9% of distributors say they “track successful client promotions
and calculate ROI.” And only about 15% segment their clients and offer
enhanced services to these segments. These are obviously necessary steps if you want to increase business with the right clients, but using their database for this type of tracking doesn’t seem to be very popular among
distributors.
Here’s the rub: The strategy of focusing resources on increasing business from a select number of clients is rated as successful by 29% of distributors who use it, but more than 40% say it’s unsuccessful. Perhaps that’s partly because too many weren’t making full use of their database to make informed targeting decisions and create more effective new business tactics.
Similarly, suppliers’ favorite market strategy for 2002 (chosen by 28%) was “to focus resources on increasing business from a select number
of distributors,” which wasn’t even one of the top two strategies last year. In second place (25%) we find “to increase distribution channels for your services,” followed by “specializing in a niche market” (12%).
The big question, of course, is whether these strategies were profitable for suppliers. Suppliers who chose “increasing distribution channels” had a mean gross profit margin of 37.2%, considerably higher than the average of 32.8%. But for some reason suppliers were relatively disappointed with the results, rating this strategy below average in terms of success.
One of the worst groups (with a 26.7% gross profit margin) was comprised of suppliers who opted “to hold steady,” and those specializing in niche markets didn’t fare much better (a margin of 29.6%).
The interesting thing is, in spite of the widely variable gross margins associated with these strategies, suppliers rated them all as more successful than the strategy of increasing distribution channels, which actually produced the best margins. Are suppliers looking at success in terms of putting the strategy in place, or in terms of its impact on profitability?
We also asked suppliers about tracking the results of self-promotions. Our working hypothesis was that when companies know what types of promotions work best, they avoid needless spending on inferior methods and reap greater benefits by focusing resources on profitable promotions.
Our analysis confirmed that suppliers who “know exactly how much business we get from each method we use” have an average gross profit margin markedly higher than groups that take less rigorous approaches to self-promotion. Those who “don’t know” anything about results are in particularly bad shape, with an overall gross profit margin of only 29%, considerably below the overall average of 32.8%. And surprisingly, the group most likely to know exactly how much business they get from each method are small suppliers rather, than mid-sized or large suppliers as one might expect.
– Dr. Marjorie Cooper |
It’s All About You
Obviously, suppliers and distributors practice what they preach, because despite belt-tightening client budgets, self-promotion efforts – both from suppliers to distributors, and distributors to end-users – increased.
What’s interesting is how such efforts are perceived on both sides of the fence. As previously noted, trade shows and catalog mailings are suppliers’ top choices for self-promotion. But distributors, when asked how they’d prefer to hear about a supplier’s new products, ranked mailings as their first choice – although they say they prefer special flyers announcing the products rather than catalogs. Trade shows came in a distant fifth.
And though it’s undeniably effective, self-promotion comes at a price: Suppliers say they spent an average of $83,000 in this area last year, nearly double the amount they laid out in 2001. Broken out by company size, small suppliers spend an average of around $19,000 on self-promotion efforts; mid-sized firms $42,000; and large suppliers $226,000.
And for all the varying forms of self-promotion that suppliers use (trade shows, catalog mailings, e-mail promotions, Web sites, mailed flyers and samples) – to say nothing of the copious amounts of money these marketing efforts entail – systems to monitor return on investment and follow-up were alarmingly lacking.
Roughly one in four suppliers say they think they have a handle on where most of their business comes from, but they aren’t absolutely sure, while 22% report they track major self-promotion efforts (although not those they consider “routine”). And from the you’ve-got-to-be-kidding-me file: Nearly one in five (18%) suppliers who responded to this year’s survey say that distributors occasionally tell them how they came to do business with them, “but most of the time we just guess.” Yikes!
Reassuringly, 18% also said they know exactly how much business they get from each method of self-promotion they use. And the good news is that this group has an average gross profit margin noticeably higher than those with a more laissez-faire attitude.
“For 20 years I have used self-promotion campaigns and still do,” says Kayla Tollen, CAS, president of Kayla Advertising (asi/239482). “They’re always an effective tool to generate business and create good will.”
Other Channels & Challenges
As for trade shows, statistics show that supplier attendance increased in 2002, and the average number of leads generated rose from 1,726 in 2001 to 2,157 last year. Similarly, the average volume of new sales generated from those leads was nearly $220,000, an impressive jump from $129,000 in 2001.
That said, a disturbingly large share of responding suppliers (68%) say they didn’t track or follow-up on the leads they generated at trade shows. Consequently, suppliers seem to be throwing marketing darts in the dark; more attention to trade show leads could help them better determine which venues give them more bang for their exhibiting buck.
Another incendiary issue: When asked if they’ve ever sold their products to buyers through a channel other than promotional products distributors, 53% of suppliers say they have, up from 42% in 2001. Of these, the largest group (60%) use retailers, others sell through a separate division (28%), and still others use direct reps (24%). Also, smaller suppliers are more likely to use alternative channels than medium or large suppliers.
“In effect, our future and the future of this industry hinges on the creativity inside and outside our company, and I wouldn’t want it any other way,” says Drake Harrison, sales manager at Evans Manufacturing (asi/52840). “To sell outside the industry, as a means of increasing or maintaining profitability, is to turn your back on the potential this industry offers. So, if suppliers focus their entrepreneurial energy inward and not outward, they will meet or surpass their profitability goals. Time is money and if spent wisely within the industry, your return on investment will be magnified by the growth of the industry.” |
|
SOI Data-Mining
Self-Promotion, Self-Examination
We asked suppliers which methods of self-promotion they
find most successful. Two methods tied for first place: trade
shows and catalog mailings. But suppliers’ views of self-promotion are quite different than distributors’ perspectives. When we asked distributors how they would like to hear about suppliers’ new products, trade shows were ranked a distant fifth. Their top-ranked preference was for a mailing, but not a catalog. Distributors say they prefer a special flyer announcing the product.
Similarly, only 14.5% of suppliers listed print advertising as their most successful self-promotion method, while 40.3% of distributors placed print advertising in third place on the list of how they prefer to get new product announcements. Conclusion: apparently, the methods suppliers perceive as most successful in communicating with distributors aren’t necessarily the methods distributors prefer. One might think suppliers would be more successful if they used the self-promotion methods preferred by distributors. Or is it that distributors really respond more to those methods that suppliers see as most successful?
Since suppliers in this year’s study tend to view the industry
as less healthy than their distributor counterparts, we were interested in the extent to which they would undertake “extra
measures” to keep current customers and/or increase business with them. The big push in 2002 (chosen by 61% of suppliers)
was to expand product lines/product offerings. In second place (59%) was special pricing/sales, followed by calling on distributors more often (48%).
Large suppliers were more likely to take extra measures
than either small or mid-sized suppliers, but more than 63% of
all suppliers report they’ve taken extra measures. An obvious
question would be whether suppliers taking those extra measures actually turned out to be more profitable. In fact, those who did were slightly more profitable (an average gross profit
margin of 32.5% vs. 31.9% for those who didn’t). And those who
did were also more likely to have experienced sales volume
increases during 2002.
– Dr. Marjorie Cooper |
|
|
A majority of suppliers also said they took “extra” measures to retain their current customers and/or get a larger share of their orders. Key examples include expanding their lines/product offerings, offering special pricing and sales, calling on distributors more often, offering more services (such as a shipping system, art and custom products), and reducing lead time by increasing efficiency
The increasing number of suppliers who engaged in these practices could have been trying to offset the negative effects of the economy, given the small-investment-big-payoff quotient of such efforts. And as you might expect, more large suppliers (81%) say they took extra measures to increase their market share than smaller suppliers who are more limited in their resources. However, regardless of company size, those who did employ such measures saw their sales volume increase, substantiating this as a marketing strategy with tangible ROI.
Suppliers may also want to look at their business ethics and promote them to their distributor partners. Why? Because distributors who responded to this year’s SOI say issues such as sweatshop labor, suppliers offering employees a living wage and using environmentally-friendly and USA-made products carry a lot of weight when it comes to deciding which suppliers to do business with.
|
The Average Number Of Trade Shows Suppliers Attended/Exhibited At In 2002
(and 2001)
|
2002 |
2001 |
| End-user shows |
3 |
2 |
| Individual distributor shows |
4 |
3 |
| National promotional products shows |
3 |
3 |
| Regional promotional products shows |
4 |
5 |
| Tabletop shows |
8 |
N/A |
| Ancillary-industry trades shows |
1 |
3 |
Source: The Counselor; annual State of the Industry surveys. ©2003 and ©2002 |
|
Distributors Weigh In
How are things on the distributor side? Starting with the big picture, distributors sell to clients locally and regionally in almost equal numbers, with national clients counting for only slightly less of their total customer base, leading one to conclude that geography is no longer an issue – not hard to fathom, given the technological advances in ordering and art transfer, as well as suppliers’ ability to turnaround orders more quickly than ever (not to mention the miracle that is overnight delivery). How about venturing outside America’s borders? No big surprises here: The ratio of distributors with clients overseas is only 17%, though that is up slightly from last year.
When asked to describe their market strategy in 2002, the largest share of distributors (35%) echoed suppliers: focus resources on increasing business from a select number of clients. Though this was also the top distributor strategy in 2001, the number was notably higher (57%).
And how are distributors keeping track of all these clients? Well, three-quarters of them say they maintain a database of their clients, but the bad news is that nearly 23% do not. Of those who do maintain a database, the majority track purchase amount, purchase frequency and client profitability, in that order. On the other hand, very few distributors track the lifetime value of a client or attempt to segment clients and tailor enhanced services to those segments.
This is interesting, considering the commonly held belief that it’s easier (and less expensive) to generate more business from existing clients, while breaking into new markets and/or cultivating new distribution channels often require more time and financial resources. Proof that it works: The majority of distributors who pursued this option responded that they’ve seen increased profits due to their expanded efforts.
“Don’t have enough business?,” asks Joseph Scott, MAS, vice president of sales & marketing for Scott & Assoc. (asi/321502) and an industry education facilitator, “then make more cold calls, ask for referrals, utilize your network. As distributors we should be able to help our clients plan ahead by reviewing their order history, viewing their promotional calendar and calling them 3-4 months in advance.”
Expanding And Retaining
Increasing distribution channels and seeking new domestic markets were other strategies distributors focused on in 2002, as were adding services such as art, design and layout, imprinting/personalization, company store/catalog programs, fulfillment and complete sales promotion agency services. This seems to indicate that distributors are adding services to better market themselves to clients.
Less than two-thirds of distributors (60%) say they took steps beyond their normal efforts – calling on clients more often, sending catalogs to clients and calling on more/new departments within the clients’ companies – to retain current clients and/or get a larger share of the promotional dollars from existing clients. This is kind of surprising, given the current state of the economy. And flying in the face of the long-held view that rushing to cut prices is a rookie reaction, distributors who say they did so in 2002 have an average of 12 years of experience in the industry.
A related piece of data: Though education/ schools/universities overtook manufacturing on the list of distributors’ top markets (34% say it’s their No. 1 channel), it will be interesting to see if it retains that spot this year, in light of the rampant cuts in state and federal education spending. |
|
SOI Data-Mining
Top-Market Sellers
So who are the distributors selling to the most profitable top
market, “education/schools/universities,” and what are their
techniques? Here’s a peek:
Like most distributors, they’re primarily family-owned businesses and tend to be smaller companies. Their client base is slightly smaller (340) than that of the average distributor (352). They’re most likely to focus their resources on increasing business from a select number of clients as their top market strategy, and they called on clients more often as an extra measure to keep or build customer relationships.
They say their clients primarily purchase promotional products for “event marketing.” And they usually offer art/design/layout and imprinting/ personalization services. They also tend to charge for time and creative services, and the top product categories they sell are shirts and writing instruments. Most (slightly more than two-thirds) do not import promotional products.
Why is this niche so profitable? Perhaps because of the lower selling expenses (9% vs. 11%) and better cashflow (a DSO of 31 days vs. 35 for distributors as a whole).
– Dr. Marjorie Cooper |
|
|
The Road To Profitability
Reiterating what the industry has been espousing for years, apparently it’s more profitable to sell marketing ideas and solutions as opposed to just products. Roughly 25% of distributors say their most profitable clients are those willing to pay a premium for such things as copywriting, complete ad agency services, Web-based promotion/design, and results/ROI marketing analysis. Other top vote-getters: clients who place the same order repeatedly (18%) and clients who know what they want and just need you to take the order (16%).

While it may be true that the latter two categories require relatively little time and effort, there’s something to be said for going the extra mile. Crunching the numbers, we find that distributors whose clients see them as creative consultants seem to enjoy longer relationships and higher profits: Even though only 36% of distributors say they charge clients for their creative time, 47% of those who do increased their profits in 2002. Of those who don’t, only 35% had higher profits.
Both Scott and Robert Berman, owner of Strategic Marketing Alliance in Bellevue, WA (asi/337857) and a frequent speaker at ASI shows, have been charging clients for their creative consulting services for years – everything from mapping out a marketing strategy to design and Web development, copywriting and rights and usage to intellectual property such as program ideas.
“By far, the best clients and the best profits are from those I have that kind of relationship with,” Berman says. “I really got sick of being taken advantage of. Think about it. Any other design firm or creative agency would charge for their time. It’s what they do for a living, so why wouldn’t we? Isn’t this what we do for a living?”
Berman says he determines how much to charge clients by estimating how much time and energy will be involved, adding, “I can – and do – charge hourly, but I think it’s better for all parties to work on a monthly retainer.”
|
SOI Data-Mining
International Sellers
Not surprisingly, the percentage of distributors that sell internationally is much smaller (17.4%) than those who sell nationally (59%), regionally (65%) or locally (68%). This was a slight increase over last year’s percentage (16.8%), however, so it may be that the comfort level in selling internationally is returning.
How successful are those who sell internationally? For example, are they more or less profitable than other firms? According to State of the Industry data, those who sell internationally have only slightly lower gross profit margins than those who don’t (33% vs. 34%). International distributors were slightly more likely than distributors in general to have seen declining or flat sales in 2002 – perhaps due to the challenges inherent in exporting and importing. A final measure is their average DSO (days sales outstanding), which is significantly higher for distributors selling internationally – 38.8 days vs. an overall average of 34.9 days.
It certainly doesn’t have anything to do with lack of experience, since international distributors have been in the industry longer (15 years compared with an average of 13 years) than distributors in general. They also tend to offer more services than the average distributor, particularly company store/catalog programs. As with most of their brethren, they identify their main source of competition as “other distributors.”
Does having international sales experience increase a distributor’s propensity to import promotional products from another country? Could be. Although 31% of all distributors say they import promotional products, that number rises to 54% for distributors who sell internationally.
– Dr. Marjorie Cooper |
Forward Thinking
“The economy is still having its way with our industry,” says Glen Colton, MAS, president of Atlanta-based Seville Marketing Inc. (asi/323798) and a columnist for ADvantages magazine. “My experience has been that advertising and marketing – of which our industry is part – are much like the canary in the coal mine: We’re among the first to feel the effects of an economic downturn. Are things getting better? The trend I see has been the opposite of improvement. There is way too much emphasis on costs and an astounding lack of planning when it comes to promotional products.”

Colton maintains that the stagnant economy and peoples’ natural fear of being fired when business is off has caused decision-makers to hesitate before spending. In effect, they’re seeking permission to spend money for fear they might be punished otherwise. “Upper management can’t be bothered, or else they make the safe decision to do nothing,” he says. “Thus, the (formerly) bold decision-maker is now reduced to being a flinching influencer. He or she then plays it safer still and gets three bids on every project.
|
Q:
Distributors, what are the top five
markets for promotional products?
(Last year’s rank)
1. (2) Education/schools/universities (34.3%)
2. (1) Manufacturing (32%)
3. (4) Financial institutions (26.5%)
4. (NA) Professional services (26.3%)
5. (5) Medical/hospitals (23.8%)
Note: Distributors were asked to check off the top three markets they sold to in terms of sales volume. ‘Financial institutions’ is slowly edging back to the top. ‘Professional services’ is new to the rankings this year, while ‘Associations/Clubs/Civic Groups’ fell from the Top 5 list altogether.
Source: The Counselor; annual State of the Industry survey ©2003. |
|
“So all of our knowledge and creativity go out the window, and it gets down to a battle over pricing. I have no adequate defense when my prices are being undercut. What I want to do is sit these people down and tell them, ‘You are not going to keep your job because you got three bids on an order for 5,000 pencils, and you are certainly not going to get promoted if you should happen to mention that in your resume.’”

When asked about how suppliers’ and distributors’ marketing strategies in 2003 are going to fare come next year’s State of the Industry report, Harrison believes that imagination, innovation and entrepreneurial, maximized by the free enterprise system, has worked to … make this nation the greatest this world has ever seen, he says. “I feel that our industry’s ability to respond to a challenge will lift us up out of this funk we seem to be in. This rising tide will lift suppliers, distributors and clients, and as a result, the nation as well.”
Colton, in his left-of-center way of looking at things, offers this assessment: “I’m putting all my savings into gold coins and purchasing a year’s supply of dehydrated food,” he laughs. “I also have my eye on this cabin in the mountains of North Carolina that has its own well and a good cave system nearby.”
|
SOI Data-Mining
Will The Real Competition Please
Stand Up?
Distributors say their most significant source of competition is “existing distributors being more competitive,” but mail-order distributors/catalogers moved up to the second spot this year, with price-cutters holding down third place. Variations do exist, of course. Small distributors ranked mail-order distributors/catalogers as their biggest competitor. Both medium and large distributors gave the second-place position to price-cutters.
Initially, it seemed obvious that full-service distributors – those
who offer art, design, layout, company store/catalog programs, copywriting, fufillment, warehousing/inventory management, imprinting/personalization, Web-based promotion/design, results/ROI tracking/analysis, etc. – would be more likely to view ad agencies and/or full-service promotion agencies as their top competition. But that logic proved faulty when we found that full-service distributors actually see other distributors as their top competition, just as the majority of distributors do.
This is a bit puzzling. If you really do define your business more broadly, why would you continue to define your competition in the
narrowest sense? And if that assessment is accurate – that is, if other distributors are your most important competition – then it begs the
question of whether you have, in fact, successfully differentiated
yourself at all.
As usual, “industry suppliers in my own product category” was the overwhelming choice of competition among suppliers. In second place we find “distributors sourcing products overseas,” followed by “industry suppliers expanding their lines to include products similar to mine.” Suppliers are wise to be concerned about overseas sourcing, since nearly one-third of distributors say they import promotional products, averaging roughly 12% of their sales volume in imports.
However, suppliers aren’t immune from their own brand of conventional myopia. The fact is, almost 40% of distributors report doing
some of their own imprinting/personalization in-house, and they
say they average about 42% of their sales volume in self-imprinted
products. That’s a fairly significant proportion of total industry
sales volume for distributors to be doing themselves, rather than
contracting out to suppliers.
And as if that weren’t enough to concern suppliers, 79.1% of distributors say they’re purchasing at least some of their products from domestic suppliers outside the promotional products industry. Those who do this average nearly 15% of their sales volume from outside suppliers, yet only 4.1% of suppliers in this year’s survey selected “manufacturers/dealers outside of the industry selling to distributors/ end buyers” as their main competition.
– Dr. Marjorie Cooper |
Michele Bell is senior editor and Matt Histand is associate editor of
The Counselor. You can reach them at mbell@asicentral.com
or mhistand@asicentral.com. |